|
Post by spiderman62 on Aug 1, 2014 17:58:33 GMT
Recently learned that we have a new member called Botolo, just wanted to say welcome to the forum.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 1, 2014 18:01:44 GMT
As recently as today, right?
|
|
|
Post by spiderman62 on Aug 1, 2014 18:07:45 GMT
Well, that was the first time I noticed his name there at least lol.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 1, 2014 18:08:33 GMT
I meant that he signed up today, mate!
|
|
|
Post by spiderman62 on Aug 1, 2014 18:10:06 GMT
I meant that he signed up today, mate! Well I wasn't sure simply because I wasn't sure if I'd simply missed his name yesterday I tend to do stuff like that.
Still, welcome to the forum Botolo.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 1, 2014 18:12:44 GMT
I already did that via PM, but of course is appropriate to also do it in public, now let's hope he stumbles upon this thread
|
|
|
Post by spiderman62 on Aug 1, 2014 18:13:26 GMT
Hopefully and that Botolo becomes a regular.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 1, 2014 18:22:27 GMT
You mean unlike Probalus and Scott Taylor?
|
|
|
Post by spiderman62 on Aug 1, 2014 18:37:49 GMT
Yeah.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 1, 2014 19:14:23 GMT
Well, you never know what people will find interesting, so let's hope Botolo evaluates the posts as enticing, and we don't see a repetition of those cases.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 19, 2014 6:57:30 GMT
Time for a new introduction, in this case the peculiar account "test". Initially, I created it for the sole purpose of seeing things trough the eyes of a regular member, but it soon proved to be more useful. When Drew asked a couple of questions, that I thought could be shared by other members, I decided to post them in the appropriate thread. Since then, test has taken different masks, to impersonate other people. Their posts were made in other forums, or part of private conversations they agreed to have published.
I know this isn't the most straightforward method. It would be better to create different accounts for each person, so the posts could be immediately identified, but that's not something I'm comfortable with. As you can read in this same thread, Probalus and Scott Taylor already had their accounts deleted, because they hadn't even logged in. I don't want to distort forum member statistics any more than absolutely necessary, which means an amalgam account like "test" was the best way to go around what I wanted. Getting in this forum the content I wanted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 9:36:07 GMT
Do i really want to know what he said about Gwen, or a scale of 1 to 10 how bad was it.
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 28, 2014 13:03:01 GMT
Do i really want to know what he said about Gwen, or a scale of 1 to 10 how bad was it. There's not a single outrageous comment, is more like a string of not very credible ones (for a fan): You can find the full posts in my Gwen thread "on the other side". Also, in the "main" one:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2014 12:09:57 GMT
Do i really want to know what he said about Gwen, or a scale of 1 to 10 how bad was it. There's not a single outrageous comment, is more like a string of not very credible ones (for a fan): You can find the full posts in my Gwen thread "on the other side". Also, in the "main" one: Ok thats kinda bad especially it is kinda well known that Conway didn't like her and pushed MJ as a love interest and that status quo hasn't changed much
|
|
|
Post by Ozymandias on Aug 29, 2014 12:45:02 GMT
Well, the bit about Conway fleshing out Gwen's character sounds strange, considering what you point out, but I wouldn't disregard it completely just yet. Once I reach that point in her fictional biography, in the Chameleonic Gwen thread, I'll have something more to add. For the moment, let me tell you that my preliminary take on Conway's approach to Gwen, isn't what I initially expected. While writing the last article for the Top 100 list, I took a glance at the issues leading to ASM #121, and I'd say she was ok. To continue.
|
|